The spate of airline crashes in Asia – most recently the Phuket crash involving a 24 year old airliner – has prompted considerable discussion about aviation safety.
We have therefore done some research. The Federal Aviation Administration (USA) says ‘there currently is no evidence in accident data that would support the ranking of individual airlines’.
We sensed a big cop out, and we searched and found www.planecrashinfo.com:
§ Top of the list are US airlines (e.g. Delta, AA, Continental), despite each having a number of ‘fatal events’ – their substantial number of flights work in their favour.
§ Bottom of list are Cubana, China Airlines, Indian Air Lines, Pakistan International Airlines, Iran Air.
§ Clean sheets over the last 20 years are BA, Iberia, JAL, Air Lingus, Cathay, Qantas, Air India, El Al, Air Canada and Southwest Airlines. Air NZ is there too courtesy of the 20 year time frame.
The considered opinion is that airline safety is largely determined by four factors – aircraft age; maintenance; pilot skills; flying conditions (mountains, ice, rain).
The first variable can at least be quantified – Qantas doesn’t fare well with an average aircraft age of 10.8 years (explains its recent splurge on new aircraft). Others at the high end are North West (13.4), Delta (12.2) and JAL (12.1).
Airlines with young fleets include Emirates (3.1), Virgin Blue (4), Singapore Airlines (5.3) and Air NZ (6). Happy contemplating!